Current:Home > reviewsX marks the lawsuit: Elon Musk’s social media company sues nonprofit highlighting site’s hate speech -NextFrontier Capital
X marks the lawsuit: Elon Musk’s social media company sues nonprofit highlighting site’s hate speech
View
Date:2025-04-17 20:30:30
WASHINGTON (AP) — X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, has sued a group of researchers — alleging their work highlighting an increase in hate speech on the platform cost the company millions of dollars of advertising revenue.
The suit, filed late Monday night in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California, accuses the nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate of violating X’s terms of service by improperly collecting a vast amount of data for its analysis. The suit also alleges, without offering evidence, that the organization is funded by foreign governments and media companies who view X as competition.
The legal fight between the tech company, which was acquired by Elon Musk last year, and the center could have significant implications for a growing number of researchers and advocacy groups that seek to help the public understand how social media is shaping society and culture.
With offices in the U.S. and United Kingdom, the center regularly publishes reports on hate speech, extremism and harmful behavior on social media platforms like X, TikTok or Facebook. The organization has published several reports critical of Musk’s leadership, detailing an increase in anti-LGBTQ hate speech as well as climate misinformation since his purchase.
In its lawsuit, X alleges the center violated its terms of service by automatically scraping large amounts of data from the site without the company’s permission. X also claims the center improperly accessed internal Twitter data, using log-on credentials it obtained from an employee at a separate company that has a business relationship with X.
Without naming any individuals or companies, the suit says the center receives funding from foreign governments as well as organizations with ties to “legacy media organizations” that see X as a rival.
The suit claims the center’s work has cost X tens of millions of dollars in lost ad revenue.
In response to the legal action, Imran Ahmed, the center’s founder and CEO, defended its work and accused Musk of using the lawsuit to silence criticism of his leadership, as well as research into the role X plays in spreading misinformation and hate speech.
“Musk is trying to ‘shoot the messenger’ who highlights the toxic content on his platform rather than deal with the toxic environment he’s created,” Ahmed said.
The center’s 2021 tax forms show it took in $1.4 million in revenue. A review of major donors shows several large charities, including the National Philanthropic Trust in the U.S. and the Oak Foundation and Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust in the U.K.
A spokesman for the group said the center receives no funding from any government entities or tech companies that could be considered competitors to X. The identities of other donors is not revealed in public documents, and the center declined to provide a list.
Musk is a self-professed free speech absolutist who has welcomed back white supremacists and election deniers to the platform, which he renamed X last month. He initially had promised that he would allow any speech on his platform that wasn’t illegal. “I hope that even my worst critics remain on Twitter, because that is what free speech means,” Musk wrote in a tweet last year.
Nevertheless, the billionaire has at times proven sensitive about critical speech directed at him or his companies. Last year, he suspended the accounts of several journalists who covered his takeover of Twitter.
__
Associated Press writer Thalia Beatty contributed to this report.
veryGood! (7291)
Related
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Ezra Miller Makes Rare Public Appearance at The Flash Premiere After Controversies
- Anthony Anderson & Cedric the Entertainer Share the Father's Day Gift Ideas Dad Really Wants
- How Energy Companies and Allies Are Turning the Law Against Protesters
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- Ohio Weighs a Nuclear Plant Bailout at FirstEnergy’s Urging. Will It Boost Renewables, Too?
- It was a bloodbath: Rare dialysis complication can kill patients in minutes — and more could be done to stop it
- Kelis and Bill Murray Are Sparking Romance Rumors and the Internet Is Totally Shaken Up
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- Yankees pitcher Jimmy Cordero suspended for rest of 2023 season for violating MLB's domestic violence policy
Ranking
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Uzo Aduba Is Pregnant, Expecting First Baby With Husband Robert Sweeting
- It was a bloodbath: Rare dialysis complication can kill patients in minutes — and more could be done to stop it
- Nordstrom Rack Has Up to 80% Off Deals on Summer Sandals From Vince Camuto, Dolce Vita & More
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Sporadic Environmental Voters Hold the Power to Shift Elections and Turn Red States Blue
- A New Book Feeds Climate Doubters, but Scientists Say the Conclusions are Misleading and Out of Date
- Dyson Flash Sale: Save $200 on the TP7A Air Purifier & Fan During This Limited-Time Deal
Recommendation
Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
Puerto Rico Passes 100% Clean Energy Bill. Will Natural Gas Imports Get in the Way?
Global Warming Means More Insects Threatening Food Crops — A Lot More, Study Warns
Amazon Shoppers Swear by This Affordable Travel Size Hair Straightener With 4,600+ Five-Star Reviews
Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
Body of missing 2-year-old girl found in Detroit, police say
Q&A: Is Elizabeth Kolbert’s New Book a Hopeful Look at the Promise of Technology, or a Cautionary Tale?
The EPA Proposes a Ban on HFC-23, the Most Potent Greenhouse Gas Among Hydrofluorocarbons, by October 2022